Archive for Job Applications

I came across this document whilst researching “Addressing Selection Criteria” for you! the readers and given it’s insightful content thought i would share it with you in full rather than referencing specific aspects.

Addressing Selection Criteria

Introduction

Many people don’t get past the first post with their job applications for Public Sector positions because they haven’t prepared their application according to the requirements. You cannot effectively write a  job application for either short or longer term positions without a job and person specification for the position, and remember job and person specifications do change.

When writing ‘full applications’, i.e. includes a resume, responses to the person Specification of a job description and covering letter, you must always address the criteria found in the Person Specification to ensure the best possible chance at selection for an interview. You will find that Job and Person specifications vary across agencies/departments, however, they are generally written in terms of ‘merit’ and increasingly in ‘outcome’ terms.

What is Selection Criteria?

Selection criteria are a list of skills, experience, and knowledge that are considered to be either essential or desirable in an applicant for them to successfully perform the duties of the position.

Why are they used?

Under Equal Opportunity legislation it is illegal to appoint a candidate on the basis of anything but their ability to do the job in question. So selection criteria are used to find

  • the best person for the job; and
  • as benchmarks against which each applicant is measured – keep panel focussed on type

of employee it should select. Each applicant is rated on how well or closely they meet each of the criteria and then ranked against the other applicants.

These Selection Criteria are used to:

  • indicate essential and desirable factors in successful job performance—for use by applicants and selection panel members
  • determine who gets shortlisted—e.g. anyone who does not satisfy the essential criteria is omitted from interview
  • determine the most appropriate types of selection methods
  • indicate the areas of concern for interview questions
  • determine the topics to be addressed in referee checks
  • measure applicants by rating them against the selection criteria
  • determine who has won on merit because they are the best person for the job
  • compare and distinguish between applicants in terms of explaining and
  • justifying the panel’s decision
  • give applicants’ focused and useful feedback

Why selection criteria must be addressed

The selection panel is required to assess each applicant in terms of how well they meet the selection criteria. However, it is not up to the selection panel, who may have 100 applications to assess, to
wade through your résumé and covering letter trying to find the relevant information about you that relates to each criterion.

The onus is on you to clearly demonstrate your value—it is not up to the selection panel to ‘guess’ or ‘decipher’ this from your application. A panel often will only have time to read your application once, therefore it must be well set out, easy to read, concise, clear and relevant.

This will assist the panel to rate your application against the selection criteria and against other applicants, and to decide who to shortlist for interview. Many good applicants are overlooked because they don’t clearly address the selection criteria and assume that the panel will be able to “read between the lines” in their résumé.

Shortlisting of applicants is based on the applicant’s ability to convince the selection panel that they can meet the essential and desirable skills necessary to perform the job.

Key expressions found in person specifications
The selection criteria or essential minimum requirements often use key phrases which indicate the type of required skill or ability. Some of these are:

  • Experience in, Proven ability in, Responsible for;
  • Awareness of, Knowledge of, An understanding , Appreciation of;
  • Ability To, Capacity To; and Contributes to;
  • Well Developed, Demonstrated, Extensive, High Level of.

To write your responses, you must understand what these words mean, as subtle differences can mean a different approach to wording your response. Following is a brief explanation of the meanings of these phrases.

Background In

Background in is often used in reference to educational qualifications or areas of specialisation (for example, accounting or marketing).

Experience In, Proven ability in, Responsible for

Experience in means you must have practical experience with the matter, have literally done the work as distinct form observed it or only had training in it. For example:
‘Experience in the use of computer packages including word processor and spreadsheet packages’, means you must show that you have performed jobs/tasks using a word processor with spreadsheet packages.

Proven ability in means that you must be able to substantiate any claims to the experience or skill, preferably indicating outcomes that you have attained. For example: ‘Proven ability in planning and organising skills’ means that you must write what you have done and achieved in these areas.
Responsible for indicates a high level of accountability and once again, means must write what you have done in meeting these responsibilities.

Awareness Of, Knowledge Of, Understanding Of, Appreciation of

These expressions are often used in reference to government policies such as EEO and OH&S, and specific responsibilities of the work area. There are subtle differences between these four terms. Careful attention should be paid to the degree of skill or knowledge required.

Awareness of involves perhaps the least amount of familiarity with a subject and can mean little more than a realisation of a matter.

Knowledge of a matter refers to familiarity gained from actual experience or from learning/training. For example; ‘demonstrated knowledge of project management’ suggests that you need more than a passing familiarity with this subject.

Understanding of is more than knowledge. It requires comprehension of the subject matter and perception about the significance of it. For example, you may have knowledge of an organisational policy in so far as you have read it and perhaps even applied some sections of it. However, to understand the policy means you know why the policy was established, who it serves, how and why it is important, and what the implications are for related policies.

Appreciation of implies you have a deeper understanding about a matter. To appreciate a matter you need both knowledge and understanding. For example: ‘an appreciation of cultural barriers experienced by sections of the community’ would mean knowing what the barriers are, understanding why they exist and how they operate, the impact they have, what is or could be done to eliminate them, and having ideas to address this issue.

Capacity To, Ability To

These words suggest degrees of ability.

Capacity can mean able to or qualified to perform a task. It suggests that you have the necessary skill or quality but may not have demonstrated it to any major extent. This is where transferable skills could be used to demonstrate capacity such as in Community Service tasks undertaken.

Ability means having the skills, knowledge and attitude (competency) to do the task required. For example if the job requires a person to handle sensitive information in a professional manner, then the ability to communicate sensitively and display empathy may be needed.

Another example could be if a person was required to organise work and follow through to completion, then the ability to manage time, prioritise, delegate, and set and meet specific time-lines may be needed. It is recommended that you check and clarify with the contact person any doubts you have about the meaning/requirements of each criterion.

You need to have a clear understanding of what they are looking for, and require, before you can effectively write to each of the criteria because as you can see, there are subtle differences between these phrases.

Added to these key phrases are other terms which distinguish the level to which they are needed. These terms include well developed, demonstrated, extensive and high level of. These terms indicate that any statements/claims that you make must be soundly supported with concrete examples that show some breadth and depth of experience/and or capability. (Villers, 2000, Chapter 7, beginning page 34)

Skills and Abilities Frequently Sought

The range of skills and qualities sought in applicants frequently include:

  • work in a team
  • work under pressure
  • work with limited supervision
  • attention to detail
  • good management of time
  • research
  • communication
  • problem-solve
  • negotiation
  • liaison
  • organisation
  • flexibility
  • This list is by no means exhaustive, however, it covers the key skills and abilities frequently mentioned in Person Specifications that are currently considered essential and desirable in employees.
  • The previous list can be divided into three broad headings:
  • work as part of a team
  • interacting with people
  • managing your own performance

Work As Part Of A Team

  • Increasingly the team, rather than the individual or office group, is being seen as critical to quality performance. Managers are seeking people who can work in and contribute to a team, either as a participant or team-leader. As a member of a team you can generally be expected to:
  • take an active part in meetings and group discussions
  • make objective and constructive suggestions about the teams goals and activities
  • contribute to planning and determining outcomes
  • produce results on time and within set budgets
  • produce accurate work
  • supervise and train others
  • contribute to the teams performance, including providing suggestions for continuous improvement
  • work with a minimum of supervision
  • organise, co-ordinate, plan and complete tasks, and follow-up outstanding matters

As a team-leader you can generally be expected to:

  • supervise, coach and train others
  • provide leadership and direction
  • set team goals and objectives
  • manage human, physical and financial resources
  • manage performance and provide feed-back
  • develop a participative and cooperative environment
  • minimise conflict
  • problem-solve

Interacting With People

Viller’s (2000, page 50) and many other researchers highlight that ‘Skill in building and maintaining relationships with people will continue to be critical in most jobs.’ Increasing attention is being placed on people skills and people management. These skills are needed work as part of a team/office group, and to work effectively with people outside of the team/office including other government agencies and people of the public, i.e. all internal and external customers. Key skills in this area include communication and customer service skills.

Broadly you need to demonstrate such abilities as:

  • being aware of cultural and diversity issues
  • effective listening
  • negotiate for win-win outcomes
  • liase and consult with people
  • co-operative and collaborate effectively
  • convey information and ideas to people
  • receive and understand information and ideas from others
  • build a network of contacts

Managing Your Own Performance

There has been a strong move in the last decade to move away from being reliant on a
supervisor/manager for all instructions. This change has brought about the concept of working in teams along with the ability to also be self-reliant, to take responsibility for one’s own behaviour and to contribute to the workplace. This is supported and reinforced by developments in enterprise bargaining, performance development and career development.

Managing your own performance means:

  • demonstrating initiative and flexibility
  • being productive and ethical (including confidentiality and honouring commitments)
  • completing to a high standard the work allocated to you
  • being able to deal with conflicting priorities and multiple tasks
  • managing your time
  • following up on outstanding matters

Therefore, when responding to these criteria, think carefully about your performance and
behaviour in the workplace.

Time-management can be demonstrated by such things as punctuality, meeting deadlines,
prioritising and planning daily work according to what is urgent and important, managing an in-tray etc.

Working under minimal supervision means you know who you are accountable to and
what the limits of your work are, you can be trusted to get on with you work without constant supervision, you can work effectively and honestly in using and managing your time, and you have a willingness to put in extra time if a deadline needs to be met.

Flexibility is a quality being increasingly sought since work life and work places are undergoing continuous change. Those who are unwilling and unable to adapt to different circumstances such as new work structures, new location, changing policies and procedures, learning and applying new skills, and embracing technology to name a few, will be left behind.

To demonstrate your ability to be flexible and adaptable to
change you could include partaking in change processes (such as contributing positively,
developing plans/policies for new work practices and being on reference groups, committees etc.) and at any time, making suggestions to improve work processes.

In summary, you need to have a good understanding of your abilities, strengths and weaknesses. In order to gain a new position, you may need to consider taking on tasks and jobs that ‘take you out of your comfort zone, i.e. they are new, challenging and personally developing—sometimes these are the tasks that on the surface appear dull and are avoided by others. So look out for these opportunities as they can be far and few between! (Villiers, 2000, Chapter 9, beginning page 48)

How do you address selection criteria?

Your statement addressing the selection criteria needs to demonstrate how your previous experience, skills, education and training have equipped you to meet the requirements of the position.

Remember that the selection panel will generally only interview those applicants who demonstrate that they meet all of the essential criteria of the person specification.
Therefore, to maximise your chances of being considered further, you must demonstrate in your application that you: meet all the essential requirements of the person specification are capable of carrying out the duties of the position concerned can meet all or most of the desirable requirements of the person specification

The Key is:
Demonstrate you have the skill by providing the evidence
(quote from degree studies, previous work experience, work in the community)

Provide specific details (for example – if using your degree studies, give name of subject where you most obtained the skills, or mention the specific duties in your job where you gained the experience)

where possible, include an indicator of success or a result (indicate the grade you achieved for the project, the favourable comments made by your employer, or the amount you raised as part of a fundraising activity)
If there are only one or two Selection Criteria specified in the advertisement, you could address them in your cover letter. However, where there are several essential and desirable criteria to address, it is better to prepare a separate document. This document would accompany your resume and cover letter.

6-Step Approach to Addressing Selection Criteria

There are a number of things you can do to make your selection criteria statement effective and easy for the selection panel to read. The first thing you need to do is to make it a separate attachment from your résumé and covering letter. This 6-step approach will help guide you in addressing selection criteria.

Step 1 Main Heading and opening sentence

Start with your heading, your name, and your opening sentence.

STATEMENT ADDRESSING THE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE POSITION OF RECREATION AND TRAILS OFFICER

Your name

The following information is provided as evidence of my ability to meet the

Selection Criteria for the above position.

Step 2: Subheadings

Use the ‘Essential Criteria’ and ‘Desirable Criteria’ as main headings, then under the

appropriate Main Heading, list each criterion as a subheading using exactly the same

wording as appears on the Person Specification form, eg. “Excellent verbal communication

skills”

Make sure you list each criterion in the same order as the selection criteria.

Step 3: Identify what they are looking for

Read each criterion carefully and highlight/underline each area of skill or experience

indicated as being required. Identify specific factors – underlining keywords may be useful

so you can break them down into meaningful components. For example, the word

‘communication’ can include meanings such as verbal, non-verbal, listening, negotiation,

questioning and feedback.

Step 4: Match the criterion to your skills set by brainstorming

For each skill set in each criterion brainstorm experiences from different aspects of life

that support your claims for the criterion. Think of specific examples, drawing on a variety

of experiences, for example:

  • Previous and current employment
  • Community Activities
  • Volunteer Work
  • Placements/Work Experience
  • Sporting Clubs/Team Activities
  • Recreational Activities
  • Fundraisers
  • Awards
  • Publications
  • Educational Studies

Look for evidence of transferable skills and abilities. While you may have not carried out a

particular duty, you may have performed similar work but in a different context (for

example working in customer of service in the Hospitality Industry may give you

transferable communication skills that relate to liaising with corporate clients).

An example – your rough notes

“Highly developed oral and written communication skills.”

  • Completed topic in communication skills at university.
  • Three years customer service experience at Transport SA
  • Delivered presentations to X agencies on X issues.
  • Committee member IPAA (elected position)
  • Experience in the preparation of reports, briefing papers.
  • Research and preparation of university assignments and reports.

Step 5: Expand on your brainstorming ideas – provide the evidence

Expand on the points you have jotted down as part of your brainstorming activity in Step 4.

You will need to be very specific and write down exactly what you did in order to

demonstrate convincingly that you can meet each criterion.

Use an introductory assertion or opening sentence such as ‘I possess a high level of skill

in…’ ‘My communication skills are demonstrated by..”

You should then support this statement, by highlighting your relevant skills and

experience by describing your major responsiblities in current or previous employment.

Such as ‘In my role of …, I have …’ This is an example of a previous situation where you

have demonstrated a particular skill or ability giving consideration to what tasks were

involved, or how you would apply the skill or ability.

Indicate the extent of your experience in relation to a particular criterion, e.g. number

of years’ experience, number of staff supervised, etc. For example:

‘I have over four years’ experience using Microsoft OUtlook on a daily basis.

I am able to use advanced features of the program, such as ….’

‘I am responsible for supervising the day-to-day work of five staff ….’

This is very useful if you want to emphasise that you have lots of experience. If your

experience is limited, you may prefer to be vague about how much you have!

Briefly give details of one or two specific things you’ve done that are good examples of

your ability to meet the criterion. For example:

‘I was responsible for organising a large seminar attended by 100 staff. This

involved ….’

Expand your previous statement by describing (step by step), what was involved in the

process. Where possible, mention the same kinds of tasks and responsibilities as are

listed in the advertised duty statement. For example:

Selection Criterion: Prepare agendas, minutes and reports for the XYZ

Committee.

‘I have been project officer to a number of senior level committees. My

responsibilities have included organising meetings, researching background

information, taking minutes, and preparing and distributing agendas,

reports and minutes.’

Where possible, indicate how successfully you meet the criterion, by providing support

or evidence of achievements, such as ‘the attached statement from …’; ‘this resulted

in…’; ‘I have improved…’ You could also do this by referring to feedback you’ve

received from others, or things you’ve set up that are still being used. For example:

‘A report I wrote about …. was well received by the …. Committee, and

circulated as a discussion paper.’

‘The accounting spreadsheet system I introduced two years ago is working

effectively and staff say that they find it easy to use.’

Mention any relevant qualifications and training you have, particularly if your

experience is limited. These might include:

details of any relevant training courses you’ve attended, such as ‘Proofing

and Editing Documents’, or ‘Dreamweaver’

subjects studied as part of award courses, such as Occcupational Health

and Safety, Project Management, etc.

As a Guide to help you to be specific, try the STAR method as follows:

S = Situation – brief outline of the setting

T = Task – what you did

A = Approach or Action you took – how you did it

R = Result – outline any outcomes

Deal with each brainstormed idea in this manner.

Make sure you use positive, strong, specific language

Avoid using the passive voice as in “My ability for detailed work has allowed me to spot

omissions and inaccuracies before information is published or distributed” (passive voice).

Instead, use the active voice and say: “As the person responsible for editing final copy, I

have become adept at spotting omissions and inaccuracies”

Avoid vague words and expressions like assisted, was involved in or helped. These don’t

say what you specifically contributed or did. So rather than “I helped produce a

newsletter” you might say: “I formatted and edited the newsletter”.

This sounds much more positive and outlines your specific contribution.

Step 6: Check Your Work

You should have someone else read your responses, checking for clarity of expression,

correct grammar and spelling as well as how accurately you have responded to each

criterion.

Consider the following:

Is the language active, strong and specific?

Have you undersold, or oversold yourself?

Have you avoided unsupported claims about your abilities?

“There is ample evidence of my excellent communication skills in my resume. I

have no doubt about my ability to effectively communicate with superiors and

subordinates”

This claim is based on your personal opinion and doesn’t offer any supporting

evidence.

Have you addressed all aspects of the criterion?

For example, with this Selection Criterion – Well developed conceptual, analytical

and research skills – you will need to provide evidence of your ability to meet all

three elements.

Have you given the information that shows you are the best candidate for the job?

Proof read for grammar and spelling.

TIPS

Imagine you are a selection panel member reading your application; how does it

sound—convincing, irritating, off-putting? Would you be keen to interview this person?

What assumptions are you making about this applicant? Are you keen to meet and

interview this person?

Content

Don’t be too concerned about any overlap of examples you use for the criteria, but try

to provide a different slant in each case.

When you come across a selection criterion that you cannot satisfy, don’t just ignore it –

your failure to address it will ‘stand out like a sore thumb’! Be prepared to write

something about your understanding of the relevance of the criterion – convince the

employer that you possess the potential to satisfy it.

Preface the examples you use with a short overview statement which clearly indicates

that you meet the criterion, and which reflects your understanding of the

relevance/importance of that specific criterion. For example, ‘In preparing for any

exhibition, working to a deadline is important, and this is a skill I have demonstrated on

numerous occasions throughout my tertiary studies and tourism sector experience.’

Layout

  • Where appropriate use dot points in your answers to help with clarity – it will make your application easier to read. Remember some points will need to be expanded on in more detail.
  • If your responses are lengthy, place each selection criterion on a separate page with the selection criterion stated at the top of every page.

Length

  • Although there are no hard and fast rules, the suggested length of the response should be between 1 to 3 paragraphs per selection criterion, although this will depend on the level of the position being applied for, and how many factors make up the criterion.

Other Presentation Tips

  • Put your name, vacancy reference number or title and page number on each page.
  • Ensure there are no errors (eg. telephone numbers and e-mail addresses) and that your sentences are grammatically correct.
  • If applications are to be sent via e-mail avoid the use of fancy fonts that may not be

part of the recipients library.

Providing Additional Information

At the end of your selection criteria statement you may like to add any extra information

that you believe is relevant to the job. Alternatively you could refer to it in your covering

letter. Examples of things you could mention include:

  • skills and abilities which you think are important and which haven’t been mentioned in the selection criteria, e.g. ‘flexibility’, ‘ability to maintain confidentiality’
  • knowledge or experience you have which you believe is important to the job, e.g. knowledge of particular University systems, policies or procedures. Make sure that any information you include is directly relevant to the position.

SAMPLE ANSWER

Let’s have a look at a selection criterion common to many roles. The wording may vary and

depend on the level of the position applied for.

Well developed oral and written communication skills as evidenced by the ability to

liaise with a range of clients at all levels.’

Many answers received by selection panels are not sufficiently detailed for panels to make

a full assessment of the applicants’ claims. Generally a three or four sentence response

would not be considered sufficient. Here is an example of a response which would not be

sufficient based on the above selection criteria.

‘I possess well developed oral and written communication skills which I have utilised

throughout my working career. At XZY Corporation I was required to liaise regularly

with people at all levels ranging from senior managers to staff, on a range of

recruitment and procedural matters. I have written a large number of documents

including memos and articles in an office newsletter.’

In this example, the broader view has been taken without the applicant outlining how they

specifically met the criteria.

Using the 6 Step Process described earlier, let’s try to improve this answer so the applicant

has the best chance of being invited to interview.

Let’s have a look at the reworked answer.

‘I possess well developed communication skills which I have gained throughout my

working career. In particular, in my role as Human Resource Officer at XZY Agency,

I liaised on a daily basis with senior managers, staff at all levels, other agencies

and members of the public. Most of the communication was face to-face, email

and by telephone and I was frequently commended for the professional manner in

which I carried out these duties.

For example, one of my key responsibilities was to organise temporary support

staff for various areas within XZY Agency. Managers would phone me to request a

temporary staff member and I would personally meet with them to discuss their

requirements. I would update the job description and brief the agency on all

aspects of the job to ensure they understood our requirements.

This process required well developed communication skills to ensure I acquired an

accurate understanding of the job and clearly communicated this to the agency. As

a result, highly suitable staff were hired .

My written communication skills are also well developed and I have utilised these

skill in writing the following documents:

Updating job descriptions;

Writing articles in a monthly newsletter; and

Writing memos to office staff.

As Human Resource Officer I was required to keep managers informed of policies

and procedures. To do this, I initiated a monthly newsletter. I wrote an article in

each publication and encouraged other staff members to submit an article or I

obtained their ideas and input. Feedback received in relation to this newsletter

was excellent and resulted in improved lines of communication between managers

and the Human Resources.’

The above response shows how the applicant gained relevant skills, give examples and

outlines detailed of what they did. The response also gives successful outcomes for all the

people involved. This response could continue by expanding upon further examples.

Source : http://www.bom.gov.au/careers/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Addressing Selection Criteria

addressing selection criteriaUndeniably, addressing selection criteria effectively is a skill. Much like any other ability, in order to write a job-winning written application, it takes time, patience, hard work and practice to develop.

With this in mind, however, it has to be said that there are ways candidates can shortcut the process of writing and learning the skill of writing job winning and compelling written applications. Applicants can arrive at the results quickly and successfully.

At the outset, addressing selection criteria should be approached from a holistic perspective. Rather than just seeing the writing of government job applications as a frustrating and time-consuming process, recognise that selection criteria are in place for very good reasons.

If you consider the selection panel when creating written responses, you will be able to tailor your writing and have a significant advantage to being shortlisted.

Points to Remember When Addressing Selection Criteria

Selection criteria:

• are used to measure candidates for job suitability and guide the selection
• provide a standardized tool for objectively selecting the right candidate. It is important to realize when addressing criteria that you are competing against other candidates with the same sets of abilities
• benefit both candidate and the selection panel. Your written application is the perfect opportunity to effectively market your skills and abilities
• provide evidence to the selection panel that a candidate can perform the position. You must provide real examples that are compelling
• can be weighted by percentage for importance. The candidate should be aware that weighting demonstrates the relative importance of what is required to successfully perform a role and what will be focused upon when selecting an appropriate candidate

Once you have entered that mind set where you see the process as a marketing tool and guide, there are a number of basics that must be considered when developing written responses. Ignoring some of these basics will potentially discourage panel members from shortlisting you for an interview.

Addressing Selection Criteria: Common Oversights

Some oversights to avoid when developing your written responses during the job application process are:

• Spelling, grammar and punctuation mistakes. If the candidate doesn’t get it right when addressing selection criteria, why would they get it right on the job?
• Convoluted written responses. Does this drawn-out waffle reflect the candidate’s job performance?
• A lack of convincing real examples. If the candidate can’t provide examples of claims, does this mean the claims aren’t true?
• Not responding to the actual criterion which surprisingly is very common. Is this an avoidance strategy because the candidate does not possess the criterion?

Listed below are five tips to successfully addressing selection criteria:

Tip 1 Carefully select the top three keyword phrases in each selection criteria statement and use these keywords in your responses

Tip 2 Call the interview panel Chairperson before you begin writing your responses and find out more information regarding the position. Ask a question like: ‘What is the focus of this position over the next twelve months?”

Tip 3 Effectively showcase your personal strengths and professional skills by matching these carefully to each job description statement

Tip 4 Avoid broad non specific language such as ‘I believe’ and ‘I think’. Ensure that your language is specific, clear and confident

Tip 5 Provide panel members measurable facts regarding your skills and experience. When describing timeframes and outcomes, make sure you provide this information in a measurable way so that panel members can gain a clearer picture of the depth of your experience

Addressing Selection Criteria – Is there a better way?

Instead of spending late nights and possibly entire weekends writing job application responses, many applicants have used a fully integrated software system that enables government job applicants to easily create high quality written responses in much less time.

About The Author

Glenn Ayrton is an Australian nationally accredited workplace trainer and assessor with over 20 years experience in local and state government. He has performed a range of roles including project management, government recruitment and training including interview technique and job application writing.

He is also the designer and creator of Australia’s first software package that assists in writing government job applications called ‘Selection Criteria Writer’. For more information please visit http://www.selectioncriteriawriter.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Glenn_Ayrton

key selection criteria

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace
Comments (1)

The Importance of Getting Selection Criteria Examples Rightexamples of selection criteria

Landing that dream government job can sometimes feel like it is out of reach. Continual job applications and persistent knock-backs can be disheartening.

Instead of finding the real source of the problem, we often look to ourselves and wonder what is wrong with our abilities. Forget this.

Have you ever considered that you are looking in the wrong place? Perhaps you have all the prerequisites for the role, but the problem likely lies in the writing of your selection criteria examples.

Are your examples letting you down?

Although there can be a number of valid reasons why that ideal job is eluding you, the fact is that often the writing of selection criteria examples may possibly be ruining your chances.

The most common reasons for this are:

1. Poorly worded examples
2. Insufficient written evidence
3. Wording that is unfamiliar with the panel members

As long as you have the skills, qualifications, experience and personal qualities, there is no reason why you aren’t, at least, being shortlisted.

The common reason applicants are not making it to the interview stage is because they’re not writing compelling examples and evidence that directly relates to the position description.

Providing those all-important selection criteria examples are one area that often lets candidates down. Well written examples must achieve the following:

1. Written using language that is familiar to the panel members
2. Provide rich examples that address principles, strategies and benefits
3. Clear description of the step by step strategy that is crystal clear

Well written examples demonstrate to panel members that you are competent and possess the skills and abilities required for the position. In short, the response you want to achieve with all readers of your examples is that ‘this person can do the job’.

Employers want to know candidates have either performed the necessary skills in a prior role; that they’ve the knowledge to do so; or, that they can easily pick up the new skill. This is shown by selection criteria examples.

The Importance of Writing Good Selection Criteria Examples

• Selection criteria examples form a significant part of the STAR (Situation, Task, Actions, Results) method of writing a selection criteria statement. Your selection criteria example should include in which role or situation you performed the skill; what you actually did; how you performed it; and, what the outcome of you performing this skill was.

• The examples you write must support your claims that you meet a certain selection criterion. As such, you need to provide actual examples that you can elaborate upon in the interview.

• Examples can be sourced from almost any aspect of your life – even if not from a similar role as the one you are applying for. Draw selection criteria examples from anywhere you’ve shown these abilities or personal attributes. The key is to use language that panel members are familiar with and talk their language.

• Written examples must clearly describe the positive outcomes and benefits achieved. What was the result of you performing this action?

Here’s a list of top tips to help you write high quality selection criteria examples:

Tip 1 Use their words in your examples

Tip 2 Make sure your language is specific and active

Tip 3 Clearly articulate the benefits achieved at the end of each example

Tip 4 Choose examples that are as closely aligned as possible to the role you are applying for

Tip 5 Research carefully both the department’s webpage and the position description in order to carefully select the most relevant keyword phrases to use in your written examples

Many government job applicants have been relieved to discover that there is a much better solution to spending entire weekends writing selection criteria applications by using software templates that can reduce and simplify the task significantly.

About The Author

Glenn Ayrton is an Australian nationally accredited workplace trainer and assessor with over 20 years experience in local and state government. He has performed a range of roles including project management, government recruitment and training including interview technique and job application writing. He is also the designer and creator of Australia’s first software package that assists in writing government job applications called ‘Selection Criteria Writer’. For more information please visit http://www.selectioncriteriawriter.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Glenn_Ayrton

key selection criteria

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace
Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

As a human resources specialist for many years, I’ve seen it all when it comes to job applications. Most disheartening were those applications in which applicants had not addressed the specified selection criteria … they went straight into the ‘no’ pile. In many cases, it was obvious from accompanying documents like the cover letter and resume, that the applicants were intelligent, experienced people who may have been good hires. However, as they hadn’t addressed the selection criteria, they had disqualified themselves from further processing. In fact, an applicant has only to miss one selection criterion to be disqualified from a recruitment process.

When an application arrived well before the vacancy closing date and it was clear that it didn’t address the selection criteria, I would always write to the applicants asking them to rewrite their applications and resubmit. I attached a short brochure advising them how to go about it. Some resubmitted, most didn’t.

Why Have Selection Criteria?

All job selection techniques ultimately follow the same premise: that if you did something well previously for an employer, you will most likely be able to do it again for another employer. Organisations that use selection criteria use them to focus the knowledge, skills and attitudes applicants posess, to those required to successfully carry out a job. Take for example, a selection criterion, ‘Demonstrated ability to use the Microsoft Office suite of software programs’. Applicants would demonstrate such ability either by giving details of a course of study they had completed that covered all MS Office programs or describing where and when they had used the programs and what they did (or a combination of both). If they had used only a few of the MS Office programs, then perhaps they wouldn’t meet the criterion.

The Challenges of Responding to Selection Criteria

The criterion above is nebulous because it doesn’t say to what extent you have to ‘use’ the software. Does it mean you’ve loaded it a few times and created a small spreadsheet, document, project outline, email, or slide show? Or does it mean that you must have mastered each program at an advanced level? In trying to create a criterion that is objective, the writer has in fact created subjectivity ie, the degree to which use is expected/required.

This highlights the first challenge of selection criteria; determining what the writer intended. Unfortunately, not all criteria writers are good at English expression. The solution is to try to ‘over qualify’ the selection criterion. In the above example, what you would do is provide examples of the type of use to which you put MS Office programs, which programs they were, and what the outcome was eg, ‘I produced a spreadsheet to calculate break-even point which used seven different formulae including sum, average,’ etc. Does this make sense?

If other applicants simply state that they use MS Office, your response has to be better because the degree of use is evident. An applicant showing a higher degree of use should beat an applicant showing a lesser degree of use, but it doesn’t say that in the criterion.

Another challenge is actually meeting selection criteria. Say the above example said, ‘Demonstrated ability to use the MS Office Suite of software programs in an accounting office. What difference do you think that would make? Heaps. It would automatically disqualify any applicant who hadn’t used the software in an accounting office. (But that’s not a good reason to chuck in the towel).

When you analyse selection criteria you need to know that you can not only meet all criteria, but each element within every criterion. If you miss one element within any criterion or all the elements of any criteria, you’re in trouble. This means that you must carefully analyse every criterion to determine how many elements it contains and respond to each element. In our previous example, we know that MS Office Suite consists of MS Word, MS Excel, MS Outlook, MS Powerpoint etc. If you miss one of those programs, you haven’t met the criterion.

Knowing when to stop writing is a good thing. Once you have written sufficient to meet the criterion, you need to stop. Giving 23 examples of how you used MS Office is superfluous and will drive the assessor nuts.

Try to intuit (guess) what criteria really want you to do and frame your answer accordingly. For example, if you were answering the above criterion for a reception job at an accounting firm, ask yourself what types of things you’d be doing. I would expect a receptionist to perhaps use email a lot, produce letters, maybe run an address book or appointments calendars. In your reply highlight the topics you feel are most related to the job. But don’t lose sight of the other elements either … remember you must address all of the criterion.

Responding to the Challenges

You can improve your responses by studying some of the written materials available that address selection criteria. Discover the secrets for yourself and practise improving your responses every time you apply. Ask those who are successful job applicants if you can read their response to see if there is anything you can learn from it. Find someone in your group of friends or colleagues who you know is excellent with the written language and ask him or her to help you by proofreading your applications.

At the end of the day, writing selection criteria isn’t rocket science. Like anything else, you can learn how to do it and master the art within a fairly short time. If you are spending time writing job applications addressing selection criteria and aren’t getting interviews, you need to ask whether you are doing the best job possible. If not, make a conscious effort to get your act together.

Copyright Robin Henry 2005

Robin Henry is an educator, human resources specialist and Internet marketer whose firm, Desert Wave Enterprises, helps individuals and businesses improve their performance by using smart processes, smart technology and personal development. He has a number of tertiary qualifications including a Bachelor of Business degree majoring in Human Resources and Development. He lives at Alice Springs In Central Australia.

key selection criteria

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace
Comments (2)

Categories